Blairwatch Exclusive: Why the Economist backed Barack
Quarsan has the Economist's David Rennie on MP3 explaining the Economist's endoresemt of Obama, followed by Gerald Loftus, Democrat Abroad with campaign insights and what Obama will do in office, if elected.
Labels: US elections
posted by Rachel at 1:11 pm
"because they'd worked out he was likely to win"?
so this is my first blog... or should i say "blowk linked oxidative glycolysis" not quite sure where i was goin with that one... but what i would like to discuss with myself to anyone who will listen is the fact that we all swarm to the poor soul who is not given the right of way in life... is the thought of the americans (including myself) who look at mexicans and wonder why they think they deserve the right to breath american air... despite the fact that i look at the cnn article of the down's kid who will not get american tax dollars to help him pay for his sickness...
does it matter that his parents were warned to abort this child before delivery?
should the responsibility of the payout of american tax dollars rest on the back of an indescisive cizilian who helps define the poverty pay rate??
should a 24 year old college graduate, abitious virgin, pay for the right of a 16 year old's high school dropout stoner child to exist??
evolution has resulted in mechanisms for our "homo sapiens" to exist... will our society and political desires agree with our evolved natural selection?!?!
So everyone, what's the election-night plan for watching?
News24 talks down to me and buys up campaign spin like no-one else, Sky has a horrible Murdochian slant that just oozes through.
CNN Europe?
CNN for me.
Bit of BBC and muchos internetos.