Thursday, April 03, 2008

An audience for Mr Blair

For many years I found myself barely able to restrain myself from emitting a high-pitched noise every time I heard the former PM speaking. Sometimes it was barely audible, a reflex squeak of distress, suppressed in polite company. Sometimes it was a proper howl of rage, directed at the TV screen.

Now the man who just can't say no and has already forgotten his ex-adviser's suggestion that he
'should leave the stage with the crowd wanting more, must be the star who won't do the last encore' is back in London for a special one off gig.

And he can be sure of a lively audience.

People pay good money for primal screaming therapy. This is free.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

And finally....

c/o Tim. Hope you enjoyed the pints

Labels: , , ,

Good bye Tony Blair

Goodbye Tony Blair.
Though I never met you at all
You had the nous to save yourself
While those around you fall.
The sleaze it swilled around you
But it never touched your toes.
Through it all you held your nerve
And smiled through hammer-blows.

And it seems to me you lived your life
Like a showman on the stage
Always knowing who play to
Always facing down the rage.
And I would like to still believe you
Like I did ten years ago.
Your candle may have burned out
But you went on with the show.

‘Prime Minister’ was tough
The toughest role you ever played.
Washington created a superstar.
Blood was the price we paid.
Even as the thousands died
And the press all hounded you
All the spinning had to say
Was you 'believed' in what you do.

Goodbye Tony Blair
From the people that you served.
You were someone less than promised
But perhaps all that we deserved

with apologies to Elton John

PS. If you like that, try older posts How Mad is Tony Blair? and The Rules of the Game Have Changed for more subversive doggrel. And spelling of 'nous' changed on advisement

Labels: ,

Friday, June 01, 2007

Taking Liberties - a reminder

Taking Liberties

Ace film Taking Liberties opens next Friday. If lots of people go and see it on the opening weekend, it will get wider distribution across the UK. This would be a Good Thing, because the more people know about what is slowly happening to erode our birthright of freedom, the better. I have already written about it here, and I urge you to go and see it if you can. It's excellent. Here are the cinema listings.

UPDATE: Woot! Check it... BBC , Shadows on the Wall, ('unambiguous and urgent-and unmissable.' ), Londonist ('a depressing picture but is pretty darn good fun to watch; something of a paradox'), and do visit the Director's rather good blog

There is a bit of a blogger outing to see it on Saturday 9th at Brixton Ritzy's, followed by pintage, and possibly curry, so you can come to that if you want, ( email me, rachelnorthlondon AT gmail DOT com) - sadly, stalkertastic latest means I can't advertise movements, etc) or check the website for listings, which are being added all the time. Or you can beat the crowds and see it early...

DON'T MISS OUT ON AN EXCLUSIVE PREVIEW SCREENING ON TUESDAY 5TH JUNE, 6.30PM AT CLAPHAM PICTUREHOUSE
FOLLOWED BY A LIVE PANEL DISCUSSION
Names Confirmed so far:
KEN LOACH, Film Director
SHAMI CHAKRABARTI, Director of Liberty
DAVID MORRISSEY, Actor & Narrator of the Film
RIZ AHMED, Actor
NICK CLEGG, Lib Dem MP Sheffield Hallam & Shadow Home Secretary
TO BOOK YOUR TICKETS PLEASE CALL 08708 505 703 OR VISIT WWW.PICTUREHOUSES.CO.UK/TAKINGLIBERTIES

Also TUESDAY 5TH JUNE, 6.30PM AT GREENWICH PICTUREHOUSE
Preview Screening of Taking Liberties followed by a Director's Q&A with Chris Atkins
TO BOOK YOUR TICKETS PLEASE CALL 08708 505 703 OR VISIT WWW.PICTUREHOUSES.CO.UK/TAKINGLIBERTIES

Interactive fun! Here is where you can download a banner for your website.

There's more! Here is where you can BUY THE BOOK!
And what a top book it is too, by Chris Atkins, Sarah Bee and Fiona Button.
Quick, Amazon are selling out! Get your copy right now this second or gnash your teeth ( until new ones come in)

Labels: , ,

Friday, March 30, 2007

Tony Blair the Musical

Tony Blair: The Musical looks like it will be a cracking show. But they need your help!
The Show will run between 1st and 27th August at the Gilded Balloon as part of the 2007 Edinburgh festival Fringe, with London previews in July. And here is a message fron the producers...

''...By now you're no doubt thinking "they've got a great show with great songs, a great team with buckets of talent, they've even got a very pretty website - what could the people behind Tony Blair - the Musical possibly be lacking?"

Well…there is one thing. You see, one of the problems of Tony Blair's government is that it hasn't made a huge amount of provision for putting on plays about Tony Blair. Shortsighted of them? We agree! And delighted though we are to see all that arts funding being poured into the 2012 Olympic games, we could really do with a bit of cash ourselves.


It struck us as more than a little ironic that the Labour party must also have been short of money itself several times. And we asked ourselves again and again: what would Tony do?
Which is why we're giving you this unique opportunity to buy your very own peerage today! Our extremely reasonably priced packages are as follows:


£10 to become a Lord
*£25 to become an Earl
*£50 to become a Duke*''

In return for your (cough cough) "donation", you will receive the following:
- A certificate confirming your new status as a peer of the realm.

- Exclusive offers and discounts on certain performances of Tony Blair - the Musical
.- Priority booking for London previews.
- Invitations to special events at which you can meet and mingle with other peers of the realm.
- A fuzzy warm feeling at being part of a historical piece of musical theatre.

Naturally we prefer cash, but a cheque made out to Tony Blair the Musical will do.
Names and titles will be handed out pretty much at random unless you specify if there is a particular part of the realm of which you wish to be a peer.
We look forward to helping you on your way towards a greater air of self-importance and the life that befits a man with a title! (Or a woman, of course. We are fighting for a new Britain.)''


more

Labels: ,

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

David Davis comes out for an independent inquiry

...in the Sunday Telegraph at the weekend. I don't agree with all of what he says, and I am not a Conservative but I am glad that he said it. Timing is everything. Ho hum.

''America confronted its failure to prevent 9/11 with three formal inquiries. They galvanised a consensus to force through the changes required to prevent another 9/11.''

''The contrast with Britain is sobering. No independent inquiry after the July 7 bombings. No lessons learnt. A lack of political will and resources to tackle the terrorist threat. The Prime Minister's Delivery Unit describes government strategy as "immature, disjointed and weak", lacking the capacity to measure "real world impact".

''...gestures and gimmicks, including ID cards, 90-day detention and control orders, are no substitute for serious law enforcement...''

''The Conservatives will put politics aside [I'll believe that when I see it - RN] and support this Government in taking measures to strengthen our defences against another attack. But the Government must face up to past mistakes. It must be as candid about the weaknesses in our defences as it is about the terrorist threat we now face. It must answer our call for an independent inquiry into the attacks of July 2005. Britain deserves no less.''

Thing is, he's mostly right. Especially about gestures and gimmicks, and about this being above politics, though sadly the only way for politicians to take notice of any genuine concern is if it is political, or in the media and hence an ''issue''. There are hundreds of important issues for politicians to consider. But this is a very important one, because it is not just about the dreadful waste of life and injuries of summer 2005. It's about freedom and liberty and security and fear, foreign and domestic policy, communication and communities and integration and trust and where we go from here, what sort of society we build, what sort of world we live in and it affects far more people than those directly involved on 7 July 2005. It affects us all.

And I wish that the Government would just be honest with us. So there's - what - 3500 - 5000 terrorists, planning a score or more attacks? That's scary, but still dealable with, so let's stop demonising 1 million British Muslims and freaking ourselves out about The Terror That Stalks The Streets (TM) - because the actual percentages of people involved in this suicide-bombing-murder-exonerating-death-cult perversion of an ancient religion is tiny. For now.

These people planning plots are no more representative of UK Muslims than people blowing up animal labs are representative of vegetarians. Tell us the stats. We can do the maths. Fear might sell policies and newspapers and help along stale political careers - but people want to know the truth, not the hype or the sell. We're grown ups too, you know. We can deal with it, however bad it is, however bad you think it is. We got through two world wars and bombs falling on our cities day after day and people dying. Just come out with it, the real situation. You'll probably find that people are already imagining that it's a whole lot worse, because they just don't know at the moment and they don't trust the Government and that, that is far more toxic and destructive than a clear-eyed look at what went right, what went wrong and what the threat is now, after 7 July.

So M15 didn't scoop up all the clues, and made mistakes, and are still scrambling, flat out? So Government policy - especially foreign policy - but domestic economic policy too - and a thousand decisions made over a dozen years have all impacted on getting us where we stand today? Okay. Just. Admit. It.

Then can we all start from a different, better place. It's not making mistakes that's unforgiveable -it's refusing to admit it, and then trying to cover them up, and then refusing to let anyone criticise the cover ups and obfuscations and carefully chosen words, the leaks and briefings and spin, and counter-spin, and the endless avoiding of an inquiry out of what is increasingly starting to look like...embarrassment.

Which is worse than shameful, it's dishonest and disgraceful and insulting.

Come on. Just...help us out here. And help yourselves, while you are at it.
It's not that difficult. And it's starting to look like it's bloody well essential.

UPDATE: Over half of this blog's readers have signed this petition. This is a small blog, and I am asking you to circulate it and pass it around. Now, if you want to look clever and prescient, or in a few weeks or days time. Remember - David Davis has come out, so this is real, and there is no need to be scared. It's a signature. What's to lose?

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, February 24, 2007

''It is, as I say, a form of madness''

In September last year I wondered How mad is Tony Blair? It had been pondered before. But it seems to be an opinion that is even more widespread after the PM's frankly fruitbat batshit bonkers woo woo la la delusional interview last week on Radio 4 with John Humphries, in which the not-so-esteemed-these-days PM blamed all the deaths on Iraq on all the pesky terrorists. As the perenially-fabulous NotSaussure pointed out

''somehow, I don’t think it will have gone down too well at today’s meeting on gun crime if the assembled folks from the police and the Home Office said, ‘We don’t what you’re all looking at us for — it’s those bloody people with guns who’re causing the problems. If it wasn’t for them shooting each each other…’.

It seems to me utterly clear. If you take a course of action with reasonably foreseeable consequences, then you’re morally — and, frequently, legally — responsible for the results. At one point, he actually started talking about ‘hornet’s nests’ — well, yes, it’s very annoying of those hornets to behave the way they do, but it still really isn’t a good idea to poke their nests with sticks. I can just imagine the scenes at the Labour HQ after the forthcoming disaster in the local elections — wasn’t our fault; can’t blame us if the buggers won’t vote for us.''


(I think we call it something like ''reckless disregard with knowledge of the probable consequences''? Or ''gross negligence''?)

Genius columnist and fabulous dining companion Matthew Norman has a cracking column on the subject of our Dear Leader's tenuous grip on reality...

'' Seldom since David Icke treated Terry Wogan to his thoughts on the giant lizards controlling Earth can a broadcast interview have sent so many jaws plummeting so quickly. The orthodontists of Britain, if not of Basra, must be thrilled. Whether it was imminent ordeal by Humpo that explained Mr Blair's surprising absence from the unveiling of Baroness Thatcher's statue on Wednesday, I'm not sure. It may have played a part, but there is another explanation as to why the incumbent prime minister proved a fair-weather friend to his predecessor [...]

His entire life from infancy onwards has been dedicated to showing off.''

See also Marina Hyde '' Tony Blair makes Comical Ali seem the voice of reason. The former Iraqi regime spokesman's boasts seem almost prophetic. Unlike the prime minister's deluded declarations...''

I am reminded of that old vaudeville trick where the manic entertainer who can't leave the stage is removed by the swift appearance of an umbrella, stage left, hooked around his neck, to drag him into the wings as the curtain hastily falls. Can't somebody have a word?

It's getting embarassing.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

How mad is Tony Blair?

He who blinded by ambition, raises himself to a position whence he cannot mount higher, must thereafter fall with greatest loss.
Machiavelli (1469 - 1527)

It is the nature of ambition to make men liars and cheats, to hide the truth in their breasts, and show, like jugglers, another thing in their mouths, to cut all friendships and emnities to the measure of their own interest, and to make a good countenance without the help of good will.
Sallust (86 BC - 34 BC)


Flipping through the news papers today provides one with an opportunity for considered reflection on something I don't think I have pondered a very great deal since I stopped grappling with essay deadlines about the motivation of doomed literary characters.

As we all gawp at the Blair end of the Peers show, and roll about laughing at the bonkers 'Blue Peter' memo that surfaced yesterday in the Mirror and has been widely reproduced with great glee today, it is instructive to consider the nature of the rise and fall of the most powerful man in the country. And to consider what morals can be applied, and what lessons learned in our own lives from observing the effect of ambition and power upon the human psyche. Then again, we can all just forget the soul-searching and have a good belly-blast of *schadenfreude-nish laughter instead.*made-up word

The question that I am pondering now is: Is the Prime Minister mad?

And if so, has he always been mad, and it's only now the whole shiny show has run aground, the spinning wheels stuck in the mire, splattering the handful of grunting helpers shoving away at the back of the stuck vehicle with muck and slime whilst everyone else stands around, gawping and pointing and shouting unhelpful advice, that we can see it?
Did he start off quite sensible, (if a bit over-awed by cheesey mid-nineties marketing manuals and motivational management seminars), and have his head spun by nine years of the giddy heights of power?

Or was he always bonkers?

Blair gambolled onto the scene almost a decade ago, and was immediately christened 'Bambi' by the cartoonists, who portrayed him as wide-eyed, goofy-eared, with a ubiquitous toothy smile. All freshness and bounce and April- ( or May-) freshness. Then he ran through various incarnations - frequently a knobbly-kneed Boy Scout, or a smirking US poodle, until he ended up as the swivel-eyed, blood-splattered zombie that cartoonists portray him as today. In which current likeness he looks mad as mad can be, proper batshit tonto pet-scaring loopy. And perhaps he is. The signs are certainly there.

I don't know how mad I would be if I was him, after 9 years in power, flying round the world glad-handing the rich and powerful, (Cherie meanwhile shovelling freebies into her handbag) , triumphant leader of a thumping majority of drone sound-a-likes, with no Opposition to speak of, and a populace and City drunkenly letting the good times roll. I'd probably be permanently off my head, throwing red boxes out of windows, getting chauffered about in bullet-proof Jags, wearing bizarre crushed velvet purple suits and mystic ‘spiritual’ bangles, having re-birthing mud-baths, employing ex-Page 3 'style advisers', thinking the laws of the land, not to mention the laws of fashion or polite society didn't apply to me. Oh, whoops.

But there is an instructive lesson to consider in the fact that Blair wanted to be a rock star for a while, but didn't have the necessary musical genius. Then a high-falutin' lawyer, but you can perform your little socks off and grandstand all day in court and nobody really cares. It's politics instead that Anthony Charles Linton Blair chose, aka 'showbiz for ugly people'. And compared to most politicians, he's not ugly at all, and he does have nice teeth. And he wasn't a Tory. At the time. So he was always going to shine. And never has there been a man more slavishly addicted to the smell of the greasepaint, the roar of the crowd. He doesn't exist, unless someone is watching him. And when the clapping dies, what then Tony? What spiralling vortex sucks forth your soul? Why this is hell, nor am I out of it.


And now I am going to try and think of the defining political moments of Blair's career. Without googling it first.

*thinks*

Okay, there's the People's Princess stuff, the Shoulder to Shoulder 9/11 moment, the Olympics presentation with the East End kiddies, and, um…that's it. I have sat here and thought hard for over 10 minutes. And I've realised that I actually can't think of a single thing he's done that I remember as a defining moment which wasn't a totally scripted micromanaged ''meant-to-be-spontaneous'' planned photocall. Oh yeah, the sweaty shirt speech. He looked real then. But apart from that, it's all been micro-media management.

It's media-management that's done for him in the end though. We can thank frustrated journalists, revolting against the bullying Spinmeister Alistair Campbell, for acting as the effective opposition during all those long years of Tory implosion and Euroloonery, for pulling back the lurex curtain and showing us the smoke, mirrors, levers and wheels of spin whirling frantically behind the scenes, like the Wizard of Oz outed as some just some geeky guy with a clever-clogs machine. That was when it started to go wrong, when the word 'spin' entered the vernacular. (That, and the original Pop Idol didn't help, because it fatally educated the population in the black arts of marketing and moulding affable braindead ''talent'' that smiles well into a camera, and transforming it into buyable ''product''. Which killed off boybands, hurrah, but also finished off poor Smash Hits and Top of the Pops, boo).

Anyway, the wheels are off now, the gears are grinding, and as the latest out-there memo revealing the plans for more soaring rhetoric, more touchy-feely/heroic photo calls circulates, bloggers' teeth start to gnash. We make and publish our own media, these days, we write our own stories and comments and analysis, Mr Blair, and we can see how you make yours. We can tune you out if we want, or we can rip into your stuff and feed off it. And we're laughing at you, and your multi-platform brand communication, and your media strategising. We're fed up with the seeping stench of spin, the flies are buzzing round it, and there's nothing so unsexy as a dead brand. Your love-affair with marketing gurus should have told you that ten years ago.

Just how stupid do you think we are, anyway? Or do you think we are as mad as you? That we have the salesman's trick you have, Mr Blair, of believing whatever we say and hear at the moment we are saying it and hearing it, and believing it twice as hard if there is an audience?
Carry on clicking the ruby slippers, if so, for Kansas awaits.

Poor Mr Blair. Surrounded by zealots who still think it can all be solved with a Hawaian shirted photocall with Chris Evans ( Chris Evans, FFS??), maybe a prayer read in that peculiar castrated sanctimonious voice he adopts when doing Holy Joe schtick, a few jolly japes in the Blue Peter garden, a quick fumble on the sofa with that nice lady off GMTV, maybe a bit of punditry on Soccer AM. Oh, yeah, we'll really lap it up.

And the sad thing is he can't even see how much people are starting to laugh.

Actually, that's what I think will do for him in the end. The giggling pity of his subjects, not their righteous anger. The 'never mind, eh, Tony' looks, the winks behind his back as he is led gently away and given his carriage clock or the zero-interest mortgage or the Executive Directorship of the oil/arms company, the keys to the Memorial Library, the Medal of Honour, the Red Arrows fly-past, the State Funeral ( hey, maybe that's why he was angling for Thatcher to have one?), anyway, whatever he wants, just let him have it, and give him his slice of cake and his goodie bag, and someone close the door behind him as he leaves the party.

Yes, I do think we are all taking the wrong tack as we circle, smelling the blood oozing from him, ( most of it other peoples) watching the media frenzy, some of us itching to kick him, as we have been kicked in the teeth by him with his stupid restrictive legislation for daring to voice our outraged opposition, for Not Knowing What's Good For Us. He's too good at patronising us hoardes of unwashed voters, putting us all in our boxes and having ''consultative'' one-way Big Conversations that are really monologues. But sod the anger, there's no point, he's off. He's over.
And meanwhile, we should call out for those whose fingers aren't being gently prised off the arms of the Number 10 sofa, and ask them to wow us with some real ideas. Show us their abilities to think about Government, not just politics. There's no point in being cynical. Let's hear it. Out you come, nice Alan Johnson, you're being very quiet at the back. Don't be shy, Gordon, spit it out, give us a smile, you've nearly won the long war. Tell us your prescription, 'Doctor' Reid.

We're bored with ''orderly transitions'' ( argh!) and ''eye catching initiatives'' ( double argh!) and we're waiting for vision, leadership, public-spiritedness and hope. Or at least, engagement.

There you go, Labour adviser people, a New Idea. Consumer Engagement is the latest whizzy advertising buzz word. If Blair's legacy is to be a marketing-speak lexicon frequently used to sell us pups and demographically-segment us into focus-grouped swathes of obedient multi-cultural flag-waving voters in order to drive through US interests in Europe and elsewhere, then you might as well *get with the programme*. Cameron's lot are showing signs of having read the latest tomes on this sort of thing. I bet they subscribe to Marketing Week. New Labour is sooo nineties as a brand.

You need a different brand ambassador. One who washes whiter. New. Gentle Yet Powerful. Effective But Caring. Tough on stains, and the causes of stains on society. With snappy new packaging, and 3-in-one global action. I don't think it really matters who it is; it's what he or she delivers that counts. Whether it actually works. And I hope, after 9 years of 'Blairism', that the party he led will finally work that out. For all our sakes.

UPDATE: Found this. Ace. Wish I'd seen it a month ago.

Labels: ,